1 Shot 1 Kill

R3LL1K · by **R3LL1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:51 am

There where things I liked in both but the original Fable was a bit more Epic imo.

FOXHOUND DELTA · by **FOXHOUND DELTA** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:32 am

Fable 2 i never played the lost chapters

R3LL1K · by **R3LL1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:35 am

The lost chapters was Fable 1 except it had additional side quests and an epic battle with a Dragon at the end. It was awesome.

FOXHOUND DELTA · by **FOXHOUND DELTA** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:37 am

yea i know the differance but it dosent seem like anything better than fable 2 wow another dragon fight if i had a nickel for every dragon ive fought in an RPG id be a billionaire

R3LL1K · by **R3LL1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:28 pm

FOXHOUND DELTA wrote:yea i know the differance but it dosent seem like anything better than fable 2 wow another dragon fight if i had a nickel for every dragon ive fought in an RPG id be a billionaire

For that to be true you would have had to have fight 20 billion dragons. If it took you 1 minute to defeat each dragon it would take you 650 years to earn a billion dollars. I sir believe that you are lying as there is no way that you could have accomplished such a feat in your 15 years of age even if you started playing video games as soon as you got home from the hospital.

Jangalian XI · by **Jangalian XI** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:17 pm

OWNED!

COUGAR 1S1K · by **COUGAR 1S1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:18 pm

Fable TLC was better. im still playing through Fable 2 and I am kind of getting bored of it. i beat Fable TLC like 4 times and never got bored of it.

FOXHOUND DELTA · by **FOXHOUND DELTA** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:38 pm

if u ever played batan katos u would know that dragons only take 1 hit to kill and every enemey in that game is sum kind of dragon so in about 1 minute i would have killed 100

R3LL1K · by **R3LL1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:16 pm

FOXHOUND DELTA wrote:if u ever played batan katos u would know that dragons only take 1 hit to kill and every enemey in that game is sum kind of dragon so in about 1 minute i would have killed 100

If you killed 100 dragons every minute you would still have to play nonstop for 108 years to earn 1 billion dollars assuming someone would pay you a nickel for every dragon you killed.

XxBMW85xX · by **XxBMW85xX** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:05 pm

R3LL1K wrote:
FOXHOUND DELTA wrote:if u ever played batan katos u would know that dragons only take 1 hit to kill and every enemey in that game is sum kind of dragon so in about 1 minute i would have killed 100
If you killed 100 dragons every minute you would still have to play nonstop for 108 years to earn 1 billion dollars assuming someone would pay you a nickel for every dragon you killed.

Not if he was that crazy nerd that plays 40 accounts at once

R3LL1K · by **R3LL1K** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:08 pm

He would need more than 2 hands and it would really take longer since I don't think that Foxhound has ever even put a solid 50 hours a week into video games.

c7a · by **c7a** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:48 pm

fox u can always just lie and say u pplayed a game where u drop a bomb on 20 billion dragons

FOXHOUND DELTA · by **FOXHOUND DELTA** on Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:32 pm

i played this one game call canadians have the best ideas and u drop a nuke on dragons and the first level u kill over 1 billion dragons with ur nuke

CerbralAssassin · by **CerbralAssassin** on Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:06 am

wow..

Jangalian XI · by **Jangalian XI** on Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:55 pm

FOXHOUND DELTA wrote:i played this one game call canadians have the best ideas and u drop a nuke on dragons and the first level u kill over 1 billion dragons with ur nuke

LIES!

Though they do make Sour Patch Kids...

HALF-LIES!

1 Shot 1 Kill

Which was better Fable TLC or Fable 2?

Which was better Fable TLC or Fable 2?

Which was better Fable TLC or Fable 2?

Who is online